A Victory, Almost Spoiled


They did it ugly, but they did it. After one of the most incompetent victorious run chases in history, New Zealand somehow connived to turn a stroll to 182 into one of the most nerve-wracking games of cricket I’ve ever seen.

Every time New Zealand eked their way to some small degree of comfort they would connive a way to return momentum to Australia. Or, failing that, the umpires would. Following a hideous decision to give McCullum out LBW (after a thick inside edge) second ball of the chase, Neil Broom was out to a truly unctuous bit of cricket.

He and Taylor (who once again proved our best, most cool-headed batsman) had put on 42 runs for the fifth wicket, and while they weren’t flying along they looked comfortable, and had the target under control. Clarke bowled a nice flighted off spinner which Broom played over the top of, and the bails were dislodged. I was flicking between a certain outrageously good game of tennis and the cricket at the time, so only saw the dismissal live once, but remember thinking Haddin’s gloves were awfully close to the stumps.

I thought little more of it, as their were no replays of the incident, and the commentators remained as jollily silent on the issue as they were on the howler to get rid of McCullum. But this is perhaps as villainous a piece of cricket as has happened between the two nations in a good while.I think it was Mark Taylor who blithely wondered allowed as the game got achingly close in the last over “they have outlawed the underarm, haven’t they?” It was a neat bit of black humour, really, though from an unlikely source, but had we lost this game Haddin (whomust have known what happened, or at least strongly suspected) would be sitting right alongside the Chappell brothers for me.

As it was through a well-timed powerplay, Taylors cool head and a few scrambled runs from Vettori and Patel we made it home. But the thrill of victory souldn’t prevent the proper investigation of that shabby incident.

It was, in the end, an extremely exciting game of cricket  highlighted by some crushingly dull stretches. Both sides bowled impeccably, with Tait back to his terrifying best in his first spell (McCullum’s first shot to him was the most bizarre I’ve ever seen him play – it almost justified his dismissal the next ball. Almost) and Bracken was testing and accurate as usual. One element which rankled were the constant ‘conferences’ after every ball slowed the game outrageously, and looked more like a cynical ploy to deprive New Zealand of any momentum. Australian cricket is at its ugliest when the chips are down.

It was during the powerplay that we saw the wounds South Africa inflicted exposed most cruelly, the rising panic, the utter despair on the faces of Johnson and Tait (who looked close to another breakdown after a particularly effortless six from Ross Taylor). They are hurting at the moment, and with Ryder back into the side to balance it a little better (though I’m starting to feel that McCullum needs to drop to six to prevent that middle order – Taylor excepted – stodge) New Zealand has an excellent opportunity to further torture the national psyche of this team in Melbourne on Friday.

– Duncan



Filed under Cricket, News

2 responses to “A Victory, Almost Spoiled

  1. Elliot didn’t bowl and his innings was almost as painful as Fulton’s. Surley we have a better batsman than Elliot for our top six? I’m also not convinced about Fulton but maybe another game at five might be better. The ‘stodge’ in the middle is a real weakness- the complete opposite of what it was afew years ago. Our bowling attack clicked so well last night hard to see any changes there, although if the pitch is not suited might think about bringing in Diamanti for Patel. Presumably they took him over there to play.

  2. Duncan

    Yeah it’s weird with Elliott, he feels like someone the selectors have a lot more faith in than the players around him. So he stays in the team but looks a little lost out in the field. I suppose last night you could argue that the five frontline bowlers did such a good job that the part-timers were totally unnecessary, but it is odd. Fulton’s not a one day player to me, and was selected more out of a desire to not have a completely green battng line up than because his form and history demanded it. He’s a placeholder til guys like Styris and Oram come back (wouldn’t the side look shit hot with the Pig Dog back amongst it?). In any case, I heard on the radio on the way in that punter’s been stood down for three matches. WTF?! Their only in-form batsman, really, and one with an outrageously good record against us. I NEED to know the actual, behind-closed-doors Cricket Australia story behind that asap.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s